CAR-bench technical report submission is open - submit by July 26, 2026 (AoE).
IJCAI-ECAI 2026 Aug 15–21, Bremen Competition Track

CAR-bench Challenge:
Building Reliable LLM Agents
Under Real-World Uncertainty

Frontier LLMs solve only 58% of tasks consistently. Build a more reliable agent and compete for $10k+ in prizes, recognition, and a spot on the CAR-bench leaderboard.
254 public tasks · 58 tools · 19 policies · 3 evaluation dimensions

Winner announcement update: The winner announcement has been postponed to August 7, 2026 to allow additional time for a thorough evaluation. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Technical report submission is open. Submit one separate report per track by July 26, 2026 (AoE). The final-agent submission stage has concluded; the report form is now the only active submission path.
Track update: Track 1 registration remains open; Track 2 registration is now closed. Track 2 uses Cerebras-hosted gpt-oss via API, not Codex as the submitted-agent runtime, and Cerebras will provide increased rate limits compared with a free personal account. Access details will follow soon.

Timeline - all deadlines AoE

May 25 Competition opens - data, docs, and baseline agent released. Get started now →
May–Jul 2026 Open development with live dev-set leaderboard.
Jul 10 1st evaluation on hidden test set. Scores returned to participants. Cancelled
Jul 13 Final submission Google Form opens.
Jul 19 Final evaluation on hidden test set. Rankings determined.
Jul 22 Technical report submission opens.
Jul 26 Technical report submission deadline (4 pages, IJCAI format).
Aug 7 Winners announced.
Aug 15–21 Presentations at IJCAI-ECAI 2026, Bremen, Germany.
Technical report submission: The report form is open until July 26, 2026 (AoE). See the submission page for the complete, current requirements.
Open Report Form View Report Requirements

About the Benchmark

What is CAR-bench?

The problem: LLM agents are rapidly moving from research prototypes to real-world deployments, yet existing benchmarks evaluate them under idealized conditions - complete information, available tools, and unambiguous instructions. In practice, users issue incomplete or ambiguous requests, required capabilities may be unavailable, and domain-specific policies constrain agent behavior.

The approach: CAR-bench evaluates LLM agents as automotive in-car voice assistants across 254 public tasks spanning three complementary dimensions: Base multi-turn task completion (100 tasks), Hallucination limit-awareness under missing capabilities (98 tasks), and Disambiguation uncertainty resolution of ambiguous requests (56 tasks). Agents interact with an LLM-simulated user, plan and chain calls across 58 interconnected tools governed by 19 domain-specific policies, and operate over large-scale world data (48 European cities, 130K+ POIs, 1.7M+ routes).

Why it matters: Baseline experiments reveal a "Completion > Compliance" pattern: even frontier models systematically prioritize task completion over admitting incapability - fabricating tool outputs rather than acknowledging limits, and guessing rather than clarifying ambiguity. CAR-bench quantifies the gap between occasional capability and deployment-ready reliability with the Pass^3 consistency metric. A task scores 1 only if solved in all 3 trials.

Benchmark Details →   Read the Paper →   Hugging Face →   Starter Repo →

CAR-bench benchmark overview showing the three task types and evaluation framework
Overview of the CAR-bench components. (a) An LLM-simulated user generates multi-turn messages following task instructions (1); (b) the LLM agent, guided by domain policies, interacts with (c) tools to (2a) observe the environment or (2b) modify its state, until producing an informed response (3). The environment consists of (d) mutable states, (e) fixed context variables, and (f) static databases. The user instructions show the Base task type; the task types Hallucination and Disambiguation are explained in Benchmark Details.

Competition

Two Tracks

Track 1 remains open for new registrations. Track 2 is closed to new teams.

Track 1: Open Track

Use any LLM, provider, framework, or architecture, from Claude Agents SDK and LangGraph to fully custom harnesses. Compete for the Pass^3 Rank Award and an Innovation Award focused on real-world deployment quality.

Learn more →

Track 2: Cerebras Fast-Reasoning

Use direct Cerebras gpt-oss inference to build fast-reasoning agents under inference-compute constraints: bounded sequential LLM-call depth and token usage up to 500k tokens on average per task.

Registration closed. Cerebras will provide increased rate limits compared with a free personal account; access details will follow soon.

Learn more →

Awards & Prizes

🏆

Open Track

  • Rank Award - 1 team, decided solely by hidden-set Pass^3
  • Innovation Award - estimated 2-3 teams, judged on real-world deployment quality

Prizes

  • $1,000 Anthropic API credits for the Rank Award winner
  • $4,000 Anthropic API credits pool for Innovation Award winners
  • Certificate
  • (Optional) Oral presentation at IJCAI-ECAI 2026 competition slot
  • (Optional) Co-authorship on IJCAI 2027 demo paper, reporting experience of the 2026 competition
  • More prizes to be announced

Cerebras Fast-Reasoning Track

  • Cerebras Award - 2 teams, judged on compute-time-aware faster-inference design

Prizes

  • Codex Pro: 12-month allocation for the 2 winning teams, sponsored by OpenAI
  • Certificate
  • (Optional) Oral presentation at IJCAI-ECAI 2026 competition slot
  • (Optional) Co-authorship on IJCAI 2027 demo paper, reporting experience of the 2026 competition
  • More prizes to be announced

Technical report requirements and submission are maintained on the submission page →

Baselines

Can You Beat the Frontier?

Baseline results using our default agent scaffold with no optimization. Your target starts here.

Model Provider Avg Pass^3 Base Pass^3 Hall. Pass^3 Disamb. Pass^3
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic .58 .80 .48 .46
GPT-5 OpenAI .54 .66 .60 .36
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google .38 .53 .34 .28
Qwen3-32B Alibaba .31 .45 .27 .22
xLAM-2-32B Salesforce .16 .26 .11 .12

Full Leaderboard →

Prior Recognition

Validated by the Community

CAR-bench was accepted at ACL 2026 Main, selected as Hugging Face Paper of the Day, and won 1st place at UC Berkeley’s AgentX-AgentBeats Competition (Computer-Use Track, Google DeepMind-sponsored). This is the first academic competition dedicated to LLM agent reliability and limit-awareness.

Team

Organizers

A multidisciplinary team spanning academia and industry.

Johannes Kirmayr
Johannes Kirmayr
BMW & Augsburg Univ.
Lukas Stappen
Lukas Stappen
BMW Group Research
Elisabeth André
Elisabeth André
Augsburg University
Erik Cambria
Erik Cambria
NTU Singapore
Iryna Gurevych
Iryna Gurevych
TU Darmstadt
Patrick Dreisch
Patrick Dreisch
Anthropic
Natalia Vassilieva
Natalia Vassilieva
Cerebras Systems
Raj Tumuluri
Raj Tumuluri
OpenStream.ai
Varin Sikka
Varin Sikka
Stanford University

Extended Bios →

Cite

Citation

If you use CAR-bench in your research, please cite our paper.

@inproceedings{kirmayr-etal-2026-car,
    title = "{CAR}-bench: Evaluating the Consistency and Limit-Awareness of {LLM} Agents under Real-World Uncertainty",
    author = "Kirmayr, Johannes  and
      Stappen, Lukas  and
      Andre, Elisabeth",
    editor = "Liakata, Maria  and
      Moreira, Viviane P.  and
      Zhang, Jiajun  and
      Jurgens, David",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, United States",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-long.1886/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1886",
    pages = "40599--40618",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-390-6"
}